Sinnlose Schulden: Schwarz-Gelb verschenkt Geld – und schwächt ohne Not den Staat.
These two words to say almost anything. »Black and yellow," Union leaders call themselves their own government coalition, although it was a battle cry of the left long. They do not say "Christian-liberal. And certainly not, "" conservative. This latter event would be too presumptuous. Because managing a budget, this government throws just about everything on board, what was once considered conservative - in the best sense, as preserving - was.
to a conservative financial policy würde es gehören, künftige Generationen nicht mit den Schulden der Vergangenheit zu belasten. Frisches Geld würde gezielt in den Ausbau der Infrastruktur investiert, um die Produktivität der Volkswirtschaft zu erhöhen. Der Staat würde finanziell gestärkt statt durch Steuersenkungen geschwächt, weil dieser Staat für kommende Unsicherheiten gerüstet sein muss. Schwarz-Gelb jedoch spielt lieber va banque .
Wohlgemerkt: Es geht nicht darum, mitten in einer schweren Wirtschaftskrise um jeden Preis zu sparen. Natürlich muss ein Finanzminister höhere Schulden eingehen, wenn die Steuereinnahmen wegbrechen und die Ausgaben für Arbeitslose steigen. Die Regierung aber setzt noch eins drauf, gibt Geld "For heirs and hoteliers and calls the" growth acceleration law. And it promises tax cuts for 2011, although the tax burden in this country still is the slightest problem. Of all risk, a conservative-led coalition to destroy the public financial resources sustainably.
was for decades, the fiscal model of the Union characterized by a triad: the debt of today are tomorrow's taxes, because citizens know that they go shopping for debt-financed tax gifts, but rather put the money back, at the end is the state with higher debts. Now is not this triad. Now called CDU politicians such as Finance Minister Wolfgang Schäuble and Lower Saxony Premier Christian Wulff to the story. In no case should the government repeat the mistakes of the thirties and by tightening too much, the savings crisis. Apart from the fact that the Conservatives to argue exactly as Oskar Lafontaine is doing this for years: Senseless does not justify the tax cuts.
fact, the government makes doubly vulnerable. Either match the old beliefs and the citizens are rationally advance that debt-financed tax cuts only lead to higher taxes, why should they then go and buy more irrational act? Or the beliefs are no longer correct: How is the government then react in the next crisis? One more thing on it Saddle? How can a sound fiscal policy in these uncertain times, look at all? It has black and yellow no answer. And remain helpless citizens. The consumer climate at any rate has fallen with the growth acceleration law.
TIME online
# # Date By Marc Brost
17/12/2009 - 13:50 clock
0 comments:
Post a Comment