Neax 24 Studio test the OYO eBook Reader from Thalia for you.
This is now a website optimized from Neax 24 Studio.
Designed for faster access with the iPhone, iPad, iPod Touch and eBook
for Readers (OYO).
Saturday, November 6, 2010
Thursday, October 14, 2010
Dermablend Covers Moles?
Contribute Neax 24 Studio 24 Studio
Schon seit einiger Zeit können Sie nun beim Neax 24 Studio Mitwirken, und Ihre Ideen mit uns teilen.
Sie können mit Ihrer Kreativität uns unterstützen.
Wie das geht?
Sie müssen nur das Formular unter dieser Seite ausfüllen.
Hier zum Link
Es muss, noch einwenig überarbeitet werden.
Die angegebenen Daten bleiben unter uns und werden an keine anderen mitgeteilt.
Nur wenn Sie uns das recht geben, welche anvertrauten Daten wir von Ihnen erhalten haben, an Anderen mitzuteilen dürften.
Vielen Dank für Ihr Vertrauen
increases until the next time
from Neax 24 Studio 
Schon seit einiger Zeit können Sie nun beim Neax 24 Studio Mitwirken, und Ihre Ideen mit uns teilen.
Sie können mit Ihrer Kreativität uns unterstützen.
Wie das geht?
Sie müssen nur das Formular unter dieser Seite ausfüllen.
Hier zum Link
Es muss, noch einwenig überarbeitet werden.
Die angegebenen Daten bleiben unter uns und werden an keine anderen mitgeteilt.
Nur wenn Sie uns das recht geben, welche anvertrauten Daten wir von Ihnen erhalten haben, an Anderen mitzuteilen dürften.
Vielen Dank für Ihr Vertrauen
increases until the next time
from Neax 24 Studio
Thursday, August 5, 2010
Blueprint To Make Replica Of Resolute Desk
Neax rises soon to Linux
Neax Soon the 24 studio to on Linux. Specifically, the work is
Neax 24 studio now with even more operating systems.
We hope to make it an even more diverse work, and thus to obtain a more interesting result. 
Neax Soon the 24 studio to on Linux. Specifically, the work is
Neax 24 studio now with even more operating systems.
We hope to make it an even more diverse work, and thus to obtain a more interesting result.
Sunday, July 25, 2010
Green Pee And Black Poop
Gimp (Wilber on adventures) 3D Game Space
The latest from the Neax 24 Studio
In the near future to make the Neax 24 Studio before, a 3D game.
The game will be either Gimp (Wilber).
The idea of \u200b\u200bthe game is the Wilbers colors were stolen and his brush.
Wilber forced the country to search to check its color boilers, and brush.
He meets old friends and also to evil opponents.
More soon on the site Neax 24
The game will be downloadable for free as soon as the first version is ready.
That's reflected by the 24 Neax stdio
until the next time 
The latest from the Neax 24 Studio
In the near future to make the Neax 24 Studio before, a 3D game.
The game will be either Gimp (Wilber).
The idea of \u200b\u200bthe game is the Wilbers colors were stolen and his brush.
Wilber forced the country to search to check its color boilers, and brush.
He meets old friends and also to evil opponents.
More soon on the site Neax 24
The game will be downloadable for free as soon as the first version is ready.
That's reflected by the 24 Neax stdio
until the next time
Sunday, June 27, 2010
Loves When I Hit Her Cervix
defense
it is now a new website from the Studio 24 Neax defense to the board game Space. 
it is now a new website from the Studio 24 Neax defense to the board game Space. Sunday, May 16, 2010
Placement Of Badges On Brownie Vest
News on Lego Film
white Regrettably I have all of you mitteilen, das der Legofilm auf Eis gelegt wurde.
white Regrettably I have all of you mitteilen, das der Legofilm auf Eis gelegt wurde.
Mit anderen Worten daran wird vorerst nicht mehr gearbeitet.
Der Grund dafür ist das dieses Projekt viel zu viel aufwand benötigt.
Wir hoffen aber das wir eines Tages darauf zurück kommen können.
Das war es von Neax 24 Studio
Wir wünschen Ihnen eine schönes Wochenende
Are Salami And Sopressata The Same Thing?
Neax 24 studio better equipped
Nun ist das Neax 24 Studio noch besser ausgerüstet, mit einem Wacom Bamboo (Pen & Touch).
Nun ist das Neax 24 Studio noch besser ausgerüstet, mit einem Wacom Bamboo (Pen & Touch). Damit lässt sich der Cursor per Touch (Finger) oder mit einem Stift steuern.
Man kann wirklich sagen, das ist grosser Luxus.
So until next time
your Neax 24 Studio
Monday, February 22, 2010
Far Cry 2 Camo Weapons
album Niuworty
Niuworty The album is now fully listenable free and can be downloaded for free download.
hear So have a look. Have fun even when listening.
Saturday, February 13, 2010
How To Refinish A Jet Ski
BGE ist nicht machbar!
Just a big mess
From unconditional basic income earners benefit most who do not need it. It is set in motion a mindless redistribution machine.
In fact, the simplest argument against an unconditional basic income is already the best - its funding. If you all 80 million people in Germany, a basic income of, say, would be 1,000 euros, made the nearly 1,000 billion € per year. Since children consume less likely to reach 800 billion.
But at least 40 million German need a basic income does not earn enough or because they receive a sufficient pension. This in no way Needy, we would give 480 billion euros a year (40 million times per month € 1000). This is more than half of today's tax revenues. This, in turn, we save perhaps $ 20 billion a year - which is certainly on the high side - the bureaucracy and the invisible costs of examination of need.
The point is: even if one offsets 320 billion of the 800 billion from the current budget for social services and take into account the savings of 20 billion euros, 460 billion euros to remain that must be applied by all in addition. We would have to increase taxes by 50 percent to even the wealthy part of the population with incomes equip that this does not need.
Well you could raise the income tax for high income, so that part of the population that actually lives by the basic income, not to be involved in the financing for the part that does not need a basic income. In this case, the basic income produced only an incredibly high tax rate and a huge mess redistribution in the upper half of the income pyramid. At the same time, however, formed a huge tax cut lobby, which had nothing else in mind than to lower taxes again. The predictable argument: Too high taxes would the service providers, the willingness to take even if the Tax revenue is used once again to the service providers.
have led some advocates of precaution, the basic income tax comes into play. "We can still raise the VAT to the extent necessary, without disturbing the performance incentives. Stupid is also only the arithmetic. In order to raise 460 billion to be paid to those who do not really need, an increase in the VAT rate by nearly 70 points to about 90 percent. Consequently, the prices of all goods covered by the tax would almost double. This has not only an escape in the black economy to the episode, but also ensures that income in an unprecedented manner from bottom to top umverteilt werden. Jetzt zahlen ja diejenigen, die wirklich bedürftig sind, kräftig mit an diejenigen, die das Grundeinkommen nicht brauchen.
Noch absurder wird es, wenn die Unternehmer das garantierte Grundeinkommen nutzen, um die normalen Löhne entsprechend zu kürzen. Dann sinken die Realeinkommen aller Arbeitnehmer drastisch und auch ihre Nachfrage nach Konsumgütern. Da nach der Erfahrung der vergangenen Jahre niemand erwarten kann, dass Beschäftigungsgewinne den Reallohnverlust ausgleichen, wird die Konjunktur einbrechen, die Arbeitslosigkeit steigen und die Unternehmen zwingen, die Preise trotz der immensen Mehrwertsteuerbelastung zu senken. Dann sind die Gewinne wieder futsch, die sie zunächst eingesteckt haben. Only abroad, the German economy will succeed even more than it already has, because exports are indeed exempt from VAT. This will take our trading partners but as an opportunity to make their borders to subsidized goods such tight or even to conduct similar experiments in the insane deflationary way.
Heiner Flassbeck 
Just a big mess
From unconditional basic income earners benefit most who do not need it. It is set in motion a mindless redistribution machine.
In fact, the simplest argument against an unconditional basic income is already the best - its funding. If you all 80 million people in Germany, a basic income of, say, would be 1,000 euros, made the nearly 1,000 billion € per year. Since children consume less likely to reach 800 billion.
But at least 40 million German need a basic income does not earn enough or because they receive a sufficient pension. This in no way Needy, we would give 480 billion euros a year (40 million times per month € 1000). This is more than half of today's tax revenues. This, in turn, we save perhaps $ 20 billion a year - which is certainly on the high side - the bureaucracy and the invisible costs of examination of need.
The point is: even if one offsets 320 billion of the 800 billion from the current budget for social services and take into account the savings of 20 billion euros, 460 billion euros to remain that must be applied by all in addition. We would have to increase taxes by 50 percent to even the wealthy part of the population with incomes equip that this does not need.
Well you could raise the income tax for high income, so that part of the population that actually lives by the basic income, not to be involved in the financing for the part that does not need a basic income. In this case, the basic income produced only an incredibly high tax rate and a huge mess redistribution in the upper half of the income pyramid. At the same time, however, formed a huge tax cut lobby, which had nothing else in mind than to lower taxes again. The predictable argument: Too high taxes would the service providers, the willingness to take even if the Tax revenue is used once again to the service providers.
have led some advocates of precaution, the basic income tax comes into play. "We can still raise the VAT to the extent necessary, without disturbing the performance incentives. Stupid is also only the arithmetic. In order to raise 460 billion to be paid to those who do not really need, an increase in the VAT rate by nearly 70 points to about 90 percent. Consequently, the prices of all goods covered by the tax would almost double. This has not only an escape in the black economy to the episode, but also ensures that income in an unprecedented manner from bottom to top umverteilt werden. Jetzt zahlen ja diejenigen, die wirklich bedürftig sind, kräftig mit an diejenigen, die das Grundeinkommen nicht brauchen.
Noch absurder wird es, wenn die Unternehmer das garantierte Grundeinkommen nutzen, um die normalen Löhne entsprechend zu kürzen. Dann sinken die Realeinkommen aller Arbeitnehmer drastisch und auch ihre Nachfrage nach Konsumgütern. Da nach der Erfahrung der vergangenen Jahre niemand erwarten kann, dass Beschäftigungsgewinne den Reallohnverlust ausgleichen, wird die Konjunktur einbrechen, die Arbeitslosigkeit steigen und die Unternehmen zwingen, die Preise trotz der immensen Mehrwertsteuerbelastung zu senken. Dann sind die Gewinne wieder futsch, die sie zunächst eingesteckt haben. Only abroad, the German economy will succeed even more than it already has, because exports are indeed exempt from VAT. This will take our trading partners but as an opportunity to make their borders to subsidized goods such tight or even to conduct similar experiments in the insane deflationary way.
Heiner Flassbeck
Wednesday, January 13, 2010
What Does Meagan Good Do
Falschspiel im Amt
The Vice-Chancellor promises tax cuts, but denied information on provision of the necessary spending cuts. The Finance Minister has announced to roll back the debt, but says not who he wants to take away the money. Your Christian social partners from Munich say, saving even was not necessary. And over the spectacle stands a rapt Chancellor, to the lowlands of the ailing state finances prefers to say nothing more.
So turn out the players in the Christian liberal coalition government now to an extent as frivolous, which even shocked the cynics learned at the Federal Court.
This began with the recently adopted eight billion euros serious tax relief program. Since the reality objectors given the force of law in the office of a lie by the tax breaks for their clients to the "growth acceleration" transfigured. In fact, the adopted tax billions are for the benefit especially hotel owners, wealthy heirs and owners of capital, so only those people that will also increase with increasing net income their consumption any more. Even the higher child tax credit uses mainly the better-off, while poor families get nothing. And the claim that the now fifth reduction in corporate and income taxes within a decade would lead to higher investment is not true by repetition. In truth, there is no empirical evidence that tax cuts would ever improving economic performance. Detectable, however, that the thinning out of state revenue to reduce public investment. Not least because Germany is in education spending compared to the affluent countries of the OECD now slipped to the third-last place.
same time, the debt reached alarming dimensions. Even with the interest payments the Federal could be spending for all German universities are sometimes just tripled. In this situation, to promise more tax cuts, is simply irresponsible. In this respect, Finance Minister Schäuble would do well to reject this request. But he does wrong when he denied any claim that as from next year, he now wants to reach even by the Basic Law prescribed reduction of the deficit. His reference, this is the tax estimate to be seen in May, is just as negligent as transparent. The maneuver is to move only the major upcoming conflict to clear its debts to the period after the state election in North Rhine-Westphalia.
It is long been clear that the chancellor and her Finance Minister staatszersetzenden its coalition partners are a fundamental correction of the coalition agreement must wrest. The promise is not to increase taxes in the crisis, is only tenable if the grants would be reduced to the social and health insurance to tens of billions. This would at the same time the social security contributions are rising so dramatically that the government would raise the whole country against him. No coincidence, therefore, even union leaders are pushing for a financial transaction tax, as they call for the globalization critics for years. Would this have raised the taxes on property, inheritance and property only to the average level of OECD countries would, over 30 billion euros more in the treasury, and without reducing the purchasing power significantly.
If that too radical show, should consider the alternatives. The greater the interest hole in government finances, the more significant gulf between tax expense and the services provided for public services apart. Still, most people are at this state. But if it is not possible to reduce the interest burden, again, it will be widely accepted sooner or later disappear in the gap - and with it the political stability of the whole country.
Tagesspielgel online
Harald Schumann
12/01/2010 0:00 clock 
The Vice-Chancellor promises tax cuts, but denied information on provision of the necessary spending cuts. The Finance Minister has announced to roll back the debt, but says not who he wants to take away the money. Your Christian social partners from Munich say, saving even was not necessary. And over the spectacle stands a rapt Chancellor, to the lowlands of the ailing state finances prefers to say nothing more.
So turn out the players in the Christian liberal coalition government now to an extent as frivolous, which even shocked the cynics learned at the Federal Court.
This began with the recently adopted eight billion euros serious tax relief program. Since the reality objectors given the force of law in the office of a lie by the tax breaks for their clients to the "growth acceleration" transfigured. In fact, the adopted tax billions are for the benefit especially hotel owners, wealthy heirs and owners of capital, so only those people that will also increase with increasing net income their consumption any more. Even the higher child tax credit uses mainly the better-off, while poor families get nothing. And the claim that the now fifth reduction in corporate and income taxes within a decade would lead to higher investment is not true by repetition. In truth, there is no empirical evidence that tax cuts would ever improving economic performance. Detectable, however, that the thinning out of state revenue to reduce public investment. Not least because Germany is in education spending compared to the affluent countries of the OECD now slipped to the third-last place.
same time, the debt reached alarming dimensions. Even with the interest payments the Federal could be spending for all German universities are sometimes just tripled. In this situation, to promise more tax cuts, is simply irresponsible. In this respect, Finance Minister Schäuble would do well to reject this request. But he does wrong when he denied any claim that as from next year, he now wants to reach even by the Basic Law prescribed reduction of the deficit. His reference, this is the tax estimate to be seen in May, is just as negligent as transparent. The maneuver is to move only the major upcoming conflict to clear its debts to the period after the state election in North Rhine-Westphalia.
It is long been clear that the chancellor and her Finance Minister staatszersetzenden its coalition partners are a fundamental correction of the coalition agreement must wrest. The promise is not to increase taxes in the crisis, is only tenable if the grants would be reduced to the social and health insurance to tens of billions. This would at the same time the social security contributions are rising so dramatically that the government would raise the whole country against him. No coincidence, therefore, even union leaders are pushing for a financial transaction tax, as they call for the globalization critics for years. Would this have raised the taxes on property, inheritance and property only to the average level of OECD countries would, over 30 billion euros more in the treasury, and without reducing the purchasing power significantly.
If that too radical show, should consider the alternatives. The greater the interest hole in government finances, the more significant gulf between tax expense and the services provided for public services apart. Still, most people are at this state. But if it is not possible to reduce the interest burden, again, it will be widely accepted sooner or later disappear in the gap - and with it the political stability of the whole country.
Tagesspielgel online
Harald Schumann
12/01/2010 0:00 clock
Saturday, January 9, 2010
Urinary Tract Infection Premature Ejaculation
a long time nothing new
There is nothing new for a long time.
There is nothing new for a long time.
But as of today, four new music downloads available.
Have a look inside.
Neax The 24 teams still wish you a Happy and Healthy New Year
Friday, January 8, 2010
Forbidden Illeagle Cp
Rekordverschuldung: 96.900.000.000 Euro – das Staatsdefizit hat sich versechsfacht
The economic crisis has resulted in federal, state and local authorities in 2009 huge negative strikes book. They gave 96.9 billion from more than their income.
was a year ago, the shortfall in the German state treasury only 17.2 billion euros. Now Germany recorded a federal deficit of 96.9 billion euros. Reason for the exploding national debt in the current year, the heavy cost of bank bailouts, stimulus packages and reduced working hours, said the Federal Statistical Office.
increased by the economic crisis, thus spending by 7.9 percent to 838.8 billion euros. At the same time the bad economy caused a huge tax losses. This revenue declined by 2.4 percent to 741.9 billion euros.
Breakdown on national, regional and local authorities provides the load as follows: The federal budget deficit rose to 49.2 billion euros. Of this amount, 16 billion € to the special budgets called financial market stabilization fund and investment and sinking fund.
calculated for the countries there is a deficit of 24.3 billion euros. The communities and local authorities reported during the reporting period from a financial deficit of 6.7 billion euros.
net borrowing of the public finances 62 billion
Public spending rose particularly strongly to the Federation and the Länder. Significant here fell sharply increased Expenditure on investments in connection with measures to stabilize the financial market. In the municipalities and social security expenditure increases were however lower.
contributed to the decline in the revenue of public budgets substantially lower revenue from taxes and similar charges (up 3.3 percent to 662.4 billion euros). The revenue from the federal taxes and similar charges decreased by 2.6 percent to 182.4 billion euros and that of countries by 8.3 percent to 141.8 billion euros back - mainly due to lower revenues from income and corporation tax.
The municipal tax revenues were 41.9 billion with Euro um 13,0 Prozent niedriger als in den ersten drei Quartalen des Vorjahres, unter anderem ist dies auf stark rückläufige Gewerbesteuereinnahmen zurückzuführen.
Die Nettokreditaufnahme zur Finanzierung des Defizits der öffentlichen Haushalte betrug 62,8 Milliarden Euro. In den ersten drei Vorjahresquartalen hatten die öffentlichen Haushalte dagegen noch eine Nettokredit-Tilgung von 15,6 Milliarden Euro ausgewiesen.
ZEIT online
# Datum 29.12.2009 - 12:16 Uhr
# Quelle ZEIT ONLINE, Reuters 
The economic crisis has resulted in federal, state and local authorities in 2009 huge negative strikes book. They gave 96.9 billion from more than their income.
was a year ago, the shortfall in the German state treasury only 17.2 billion euros. Now Germany recorded a federal deficit of 96.9 billion euros. Reason for the exploding national debt in the current year, the heavy cost of bank bailouts, stimulus packages and reduced working hours, said the Federal Statistical Office.
increased by the economic crisis, thus spending by 7.9 percent to 838.8 billion euros. At the same time the bad economy caused a huge tax losses. This revenue declined by 2.4 percent to 741.9 billion euros.
Breakdown on national, regional and local authorities provides the load as follows: The federal budget deficit rose to 49.2 billion euros. Of this amount, 16 billion € to the special budgets called financial market stabilization fund and investment and sinking fund.
calculated for the countries there is a deficit of 24.3 billion euros. The communities and local authorities reported during the reporting period from a financial deficit of 6.7 billion euros.
net borrowing of the public finances 62 billion
Public spending rose particularly strongly to the Federation and the Länder. Significant here fell sharply increased Expenditure on investments in connection with measures to stabilize the financial market. In the municipalities and social security expenditure increases were however lower.
contributed to the decline in the revenue of public budgets substantially lower revenue from taxes and similar charges (up 3.3 percent to 662.4 billion euros). The revenue from the federal taxes and similar charges decreased by 2.6 percent to 182.4 billion euros and that of countries by 8.3 percent to 141.8 billion euros back - mainly due to lower revenues from income and corporation tax.
The municipal tax revenues were 41.9 billion with Euro um 13,0 Prozent niedriger als in den ersten drei Quartalen des Vorjahres, unter anderem ist dies auf stark rückläufige Gewerbesteuereinnahmen zurückzuführen.
Die Nettokreditaufnahme zur Finanzierung des Defizits der öffentlichen Haushalte betrug 62,8 Milliarden Euro. In den ersten drei Vorjahresquartalen hatten die öffentlichen Haushalte dagegen noch eine Nettokredit-Tilgung von 15,6 Milliarden Euro ausgewiesen.
ZEIT online
# Datum 29.12.2009 - 12:16 Uhr
# Quelle ZEIT ONLINE, Reuters
Rikers Island February Schedule
Merkels Spiel
Wo werden die Bürger geschröpft? Erst nach der Nordrhein-Westfalen-Wahl im Mai soll es zum Showdown kommen. Das ist gefährlich for the country and the government
It belongs to the political craft that a finance minister before the election does not look to the cards. So it was prior to the elections in the fall, when Peer Steinbrück (SPD) in interviews, although it said that you have to save soon - but refused to say specifically where. Now back to an election in May in North Rhine-Westphalia. And again, the Finance Minister remains vague: The inevitable reduction of public debt will definitely lead to resistance, said Steinbrück successor, Wolfgang Schäuble (CDU). But who to call early to save a lot of proposals, which would only "all talked to death."
waiting. Dodge. Only be elected once, is the motto. Remain helpless citizens in elections are supposed to decide between political options - but which lacks any basis for decision.
display
It is now all comes down to a big showdown. Until May, the black-yellow government will somehow muddling. If then the important state election in North Rhine-Westphalia won, everything should be decided at once whether a tax reform in 2011 or not. Whether the health care system is radically restructured or not. But above all, where the CDU and FDP will save concrete to reduce the record-high federal debt. Social benefits are reduced? Subsidies deleted? Or rises at the end only the VAT for all?
The political showdown, the decision at the latest possible time, is a specialty of the Chancellor. It is the pattern in the Angela Merkel makes policy. So it was in its first term, in the Union and SPD fought sometimes for weeks and was silent, the Chancellor - to hermusste in a single, painfully long night session a compromise. And now it is again. Only that the multitude of problems this time might be too big to solve at a stroke. A bigger risk for themselves and the economy has made this Chancellor ever.
reminds Basically, the situation of black and yellow Coalition government at the beginning of the title of a movie classic by Stanley Kubrick: 2010, the year when we make contact - contact with the economic reality in the country. And that is plenty of ambivalence. On the one hand - based on the growth figures of the economy - a mini-boom possible. After the incredible fall 2009, the economy in 2010 could again grow by two percent, and although the mere fact that the export-dependent industries such as automotive or engineering re-sell more abroad.
As for public finances, threatens the other, but a mega disaster. Record up to 100 billion euros Finance Minister Schäuble has new debt this year alone. Even Now the federal government will pay € 40 billion annually in interest - and is benefiting right now even the fact that the debts due on the interest rate is historically low.
is particularly desperate the situation in the cities and towns: Up to EUR 50 billion new debt they have accumulated over the next four years, estimates of the German Association of Towns and Municipalities. This is not an expression of luxurious use, but from want the misfortune of all, it not only the money for the maintenance of swimming pools, and libraries - but also for the expansion of child care, to actually want all parties. From 2013, parents of one-and two children a year Legal claim to a place. Dumb only if the respective city or municipality then has no money for it. "Here, the policy should be honest in order to" produce not new politics, calls Gerd Landsberg from the German Association of Towns and Municipalities.
This is the point at which the Finance Minister comes into the game - that political fox, then, which the Chancellor trusts appeared as the only bring out the showdown in May the maximum. Wolfgang Schäuble, the CDU is connected, so he does not yet on saving details in order not to jeopardize the election victory of his party in North Rhine-Westphalia. But the lawyer Schäuble also feels obliged laws and treaties, and therefore, looks also the problem that has given him the Chancellor along the way: The most important foundations of his work - the debt brake of the Basic Law and the debt rules of the Maastricht Treaty - will not fit partout to the coalition agreement in 2011 provided for tax reform.
I'm glad God that we have the debt brake, so the prohibition of future debt, have the Basic Law, "Schäuble admitted in an interview with the Sunday newspaper. "I do not know if I would have shown up without this law the job of finance minister." Tens of billions of euros would have to save the federal level because of this debt ban in 2011, not once, but year after year. This requires a sharper cuts, as it did the politically explosive Agenda 2010, the former SPD-Green government. And it means that the CDU and FDP have to give either to the proposed tax cuts worth € 24 billion - or that cut a lot of radical, save and delete, is as in the history of the Federal Republic of ever happened.
This is the core of the debate that will continue through May. The FDP insists on tax cuts, because the German tax system "virtually identical expropriation Moves" (party leader Guido Westerwelle) have. Underlying this is the image of a greedy, greedy state, unabashedly its citizens for decades the money from his pocket pulls. The state was "an expensive weakling who presumes to more and more influence," etched the new party general secretary Chris Lindner in the Tagesspiegel.
The government distributes the crisis cost unfair and difficult recovery. Click on the image to read our comment!
CDU and CSU have no substantive counter this ideology: Although internal party now no longer solely the financial and budget experts think that can ill afford tax cuts in 2011. But the Union lacks a political counter-proposal to the radicalism of Westerwelle-liberals, a sort of bourgeois Agenda 2010, to modernize the society könnte, ohne dem Staat die finanziellen Grundlagen zu entziehen.
Genau dies ist das Manko der Merkelschen Showdown-Strategie. Weil alle Probleme erst im Mai angepackt werden sollen, der Bundeshaushalt 2011 und die Finanzplanung für die Jahre darauf dagegen schon bis Ende Juni stehen müssen, fehlt ganz einfach die Zeit, um solch ein bürgerliches Gesamtkonzept zu erarbeiten.
So läuft die Politik der schwarz-gelben Bundesregierung auf die Wiederholung der amerikanischen Reaganomics hinaus. Genauer: auf eine Wiederholung der bitteren Erfahrungen von Reagans damaligem Budgetdirektor David Stockman.
The Education of David Stockman ist der Titel eines aufsehenerregenden Artikels, der 1981 in der Zeitschrift The Atlantic Monthly appear. Spectacular because he described the whole despair of the man who could enforce the huge tax cuts, but it failed to cut public spending accordingly. Stockman, then 35 years old, had been called to the election of Ronald Reagan to head the Office of Management and Budget. He was to accomplish the shift to the conservative supply-side policy. The idea: to produce through radical tax cuts, an economic boom - and thanks to spending cuts at the same time close the giant budget gap again.
Most economists doubted then that it could succeed. And it did. "We had a huge tax cut implemented, but the spending cuts were no longer "a drop in the bucket, Stockman confessed in a 1986 interview with Der Spiegel. Since he was already resigned from the post of budget director. Stockman left a budget deficit of more than 200 billion dollars.
A similar disaster for Germany can be prevented only if it abandons the FDP in the coming months of their tax cut ideology. That should do it without losing face. Already we gamble in government circles about a possible summit meeting between Merkel and Westerwelle in which the Chancellor makes far-reaching concessions to a major tax reform - in 2011 at the could be used, which might come 2013, the election year. not "It was important, the FDP was now" in the corner, it is said in parts of the Union. "We must build bridges."
remaining problem is that the black-yellow government savings even without tax cuts must be more than any government before. Next week begins the formal establishment of the federal budget 2011: Then the Treasury sent the so-called establishment circular to the ministries. You must then make their first budget proposals.
could save money or get the federal government as
* by increasing the contribution to unemployment insurance from 2.8 to 4 per cent (ten billion €)
* by the taxation of previously tax-free holiday and night supplements (two billion euros)
* by eliminating the commuter tax (five billion euros)
* by a zero in collective bargaining in the public service. Above all, it is the government internally and inevitable. With surprise to register in the black and yellow bearing the demand of officials to five percent more pay: if you had in the crisis finally the privilege of tenure.
All these measures would reduce the government deficit but only once - but the Minister of Finance needs each year to save at least ten billion euros. And yet there is no idea, can succeed like that. Even in the non-Treasury.
will continue until May weggeduckt.
TIME online
# # Date By Marc Brost
07/01/2010 - 18:14 clock 
Wo werden die Bürger geschröpft? Erst nach der Nordrhein-Westfalen-Wahl im Mai soll es zum Showdown kommen. Das ist gefährlich for the country and the government
It belongs to the political craft that a finance minister before the election does not look to the cards. So it was prior to the elections in the fall, when Peer Steinbrück (SPD) in interviews, although it said that you have to save soon - but refused to say specifically where. Now back to an election in May in North Rhine-Westphalia. And again, the Finance Minister remains vague: The inevitable reduction of public debt will definitely lead to resistance, said Steinbrück successor, Wolfgang Schäuble (CDU). But who to call early to save a lot of proposals, which would only "all talked to death."
waiting. Dodge. Only be elected once, is the motto. Remain helpless citizens in elections are supposed to decide between political options - but which lacks any basis for decision.
display
It is now all comes down to a big showdown. Until May, the black-yellow government will somehow muddling. If then the important state election in North Rhine-Westphalia won, everything should be decided at once whether a tax reform in 2011 or not. Whether the health care system is radically restructured or not. But above all, where the CDU and FDP will save concrete to reduce the record-high federal debt. Social benefits are reduced? Subsidies deleted? Or rises at the end only the VAT for all?
The political showdown, the decision at the latest possible time, is a specialty of the Chancellor. It is the pattern in the Angela Merkel makes policy. So it was in its first term, in the Union and SPD fought sometimes for weeks and was silent, the Chancellor - to hermusste in a single, painfully long night session a compromise. And now it is again. Only that the multitude of problems this time might be too big to solve at a stroke. A bigger risk for themselves and the economy has made this Chancellor ever.
reminds Basically, the situation of black and yellow Coalition government at the beginning of the title of a movie classic by Stanley Kubrick: 2010, the year when we make contact - contact with the economic reality in the country. And that is plenty of ambivalence. On the one hand - based on the growth figures of the economy - a mini-boom possible. After the incredible fall 2009, the economy in 2010 could again grow by two percent, and although the mere fact that the export-dependent industries such as automotive or engineering re-sell more abroad.
As for public finances, threatens the other, but a mega disaster. Record up to 100 billion euros Finance Minister Schäuble has new debt this year alone. Even Now the federal government will pay € 40 billion annually in interest - and is benefiting right now even the fact that the debts due on the interest rate is historically low.
is particularly desperate the situation in the cities and towns: Up to EUR 50 billion new debt they have accumulated over the next four years, estimates of the German Association of Towns and Municipalities. This is not an expression of luxurious use, but from want the misfortune of all, it not only the money for the maintenance of swimming pools, and libraries - but also for the expansion of child care, to actually want all parties. From 2013, parents of one-and two children a year Legal claim to a place. Dumb only if the respective city or municipality then has no money for it. "Here, the policy should be honest in order to" produce not new politics, calls Gerd Landsberg from the German Association of Towns and Municipalities.
This is the point at which the Finance Minister comes into the game - that political fox, then, which the Chancellor trusts appeared as the only bring out the showdown in May the maximum. Wolfgang Schäuble, the CDU is connected, so he does not yet on saving details in order not to jeopardize the election victory of his party in North Rhine-Westphalia. But the lawyer Schäuble also feels obliged laws and treaties, and therefore, looks also the problem that has given him the Chancellor along the way: The most important foundations of his work - the debt brake of the Basic Law and the debt rules of the Maastricht Treaty - will not fit partout to the coalition agreement in 2011 provided for tax reform.
I'm glad God that we have the debt brake, so the prohibition of future debt, have the Basic Law, "Schäuble admitted in an interview with the Sunday newspaper. "I do not know if I would have shown up without this law the job of finance minister." Tens of billions of euros would have to save the federal level because of this debt ban in 2011, not once, but year after year. This requires a sharper cuts, as it did the politically explosive Agenda 2010, the former SPD-Green government. And it means that the CDU and FDP have to give either to the proposed tax cuts worth € 24 billion - or that cut a lot of radical, save and delete, is as in the history of the Federal Republic of ever happened.
This is the core of the debate that will continue through May. The FDP insists on tax cuts, because the German tax system "virtually identical expropriation Moves" (party leader Guido Westerwelle) have. Underlying this is the image of a greedy, greedy state, unabashedly its citizens for decades the money from his pocket pulls. The state was "an expensive weakling who presumes to more and more influence," etched the new party general secretary Chris Lindner in the Tagesspiegel.
The government distributes the crisis cost unfair and difficult recovery. Click on the image to read our comment!
CDU and CSU have no substantive counter this ideology: Although internal party now no longer solely the financial and budget experts think that can ill afford tax cuts in 2011. But the Union lacks a political counter-proposal to the radicalism of Westerwelle-liberals, a sort of bourgeois Agenda 2010, to modernize the society könnte, ohne dem Staat die finanziellen Grundlagen zu entziehen.
Genau dies ist das Manko der Merkelschen Showdown-Strategie. Weil alle Probleme erst im Mai angepackt werden sollen, der Bundeshaushalt 2011 und die Finanzplanung für die Jahre darauf dagegen schon bis Ende Juni stehen müssen, fehlt ganz einfach die Zeit, um solch ein bürgerliches Gesamtkonzept zu erarbeiten.
So läuft die Politik der schwarz-gelben Bundesregierung auf die Wiederholung der amerikanischen Reaganomics hinaus. Genauer: auf eine Wiederholung der bitteren Erfahrungen von Reagans damaligem Budgetdirektor David Stockman.
The Education of David Stockman ist der Titel eines aufsehenerregenden Artikels, der 1981 in der Zeitschrift The Atlantic Monthly appear. Spectacular because he described the whole despair of the man who could enforce the huge tax cuts, but it failed to cut public spending accordingly. Stockman, then 35 years old, had been called to the election of Ronald Reagan to head the Office of Management and Budget. He was to accomplish the shift to the conservative supply-side policy. The idea: to produce through radical tax cuts, an economic boom - and thanks to spending cuts at the same time close the giant budget gap again.
Most economists doubted then that it could succeed. And it did. "We had a huge tax cut implemented, but the spending cuts were no longer "a drop in the bucket, Stockman confessed in a 1986 interview with Der Spiegel. Since he was already resigned from the post of budget director. Stockman left a budget deficit of more than 200 billion dollars.
A similar disaster for Germany can be prevented only if it abandons the FDP in the coming months of their tax cut ideology. That should do it without losing face. Already we gamble in government circles about a possible summit meeting between Merkel and Westerwelle in which the Chancellor makes far-reaching concessions to a major tax reform - in 2011 at the could be used, which might come 2013, the election year. not "It was important, the FDP was now" in the corner, it is said in parts of the Union. "We must build bridges."
remaining problem is that the black-yellow government savings even without tax cuts must be more than any government before. Next week begins the formal establishment of the federal budget 2011: Then the Treasury sent the so-called establishment circular to the ministries. You must then make their first budget proposals.
could save money or get the federal government as
* by increasing the contribution to unemployment insurance from 2.8 to 4 per cent (ten billion €)
* by the taxation of previously tax-free holiday and night supplements (two billion euros)
* by eliminating the commuter tax (five billion euros)
* by a zero in collective bargaining in the public service. Above all, it is the government internally and inevitable. With surprise to register in the black and yellow bearing the demand of officials to five percent more pay: if you had in the crisis finally the privilege of tenure.
All these measures would reduce the government deficit but only once - but the Minister of Finance needs each year to save at least ten billion euros. And yet there is no idea, can succeed like that. Even in the non-Treasury.
will continue until May weggeduckt.
TIME online
# # Date By Marc Brost
07/01/2010 - 18:14 clock
Male Brazilian Wax In Atlanta
Gekämpft und verloren: Joachen Sanio
He is an officer of the old school, dutiful and loyal - but with a penchant for intellectualism and free speech that they Man gets his position not always good. As head of the Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin), Jochen Sanio money houses closed and directors sold. When the markets started to play crazy, he was one the first to recognize the scale of the upheaval. Already in the summer of 2007 he warned of "the biggest banking crisis since 1931." With a mixture of horror and fascination watched Sanio, as unfolded in the months following the tragedy. Many a weekend, he and Bundesbank President Axel Weber to spend to bring recalcitrant bankers to heel.
Over the Berlin Sanio policy, not with his gruff manner and research done just friends. At his expertise in financial matters but no one doubts. Nevertheless, take him away now competencies. Is it after the new government, it will continue to control the banks, the Bundesbank alone be responsible. Among experts ist allerdings umstritten, ob es wirklich sinnvoll ist, einer Notenbank die Zuständigkeit für die Finanzaufsicht zu geben. Sanios Behörde, sagen seine Unterstützer, habe vielleicht nicht genau genug hingeschaut, den Fehler hätten jedoch andere Aufseher ebenfalls gemacht.
Sanio gilt als Mann der Sozialdemokraten, weil seine Behörde einst von Hans Eichel gegründet wurde. Und weil die BaFin dem Finanzministerium unterstellt ist, attackierte insbesondere die FDP deren Chef, um auf diese Weise Finanzminister Peer Steinbrück zu treffen.
Sanio selbst ist fest davon überzeugt, dass die bisherige Arbeitsteilung zwischen BaFin und Bundesbank mit den Problemen im deutschen Bankensektor nichts zu tun hat. In the public debate about the future of supervision, but he holds back. Perhaps he also feels that the reform zeal of the government has waned considerably. There are obviously for the coalition to do more important things than to rebuild two mammoth authorities. Moreover, even union leaders now entertain doubts about the plans - and Finance Minister Wolfgang Schäuble, the issue of supervision is not necessarily reform priority.
TIME online
# Mark Schieritz 
He is an officer of the old school, dutiful and loyal - but with a penchant for intellectualism and free speech that they Man gets his position not always good. As head of the Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin), Jochen Sanio money houses closed and directors sold. When the markets started to play crazy, he was one the first to recognize the scale of the upheaval. Already in the summer of 2007 he warned of "the biggest banking crisis since 1931." With a mixture of horror and fascination watched Sanio, as unfolded in the months following the tragedy. Many a weekend, he and Bundesbank President Axel Weber to spend to bring recalcitrant bankers to heel.
Over the Berlin Sanio policy, not with his gruff manner and research done just friends. At his expertise in financial matters but no one doubts. Nevertheless, take him away now competencies. Is it after the new government, it will continue to control the banks, the Bundesbank alone be responsible. Among experts ist allerdings umstritten, ob es wirklich sinnvoll ist, einer Notenbank die Zuständigkeit für die Finanzaufsicht zu geben. Sanios Behörde, sagen seine Unterstützer, habe vielleicht nicht genau genug hingeschaut, den Fehler hätten jedoch andere Aufseher ebenfalls gemacht.
Sanio gilt als Mann der Sozialdemokraten, weil seine Behörde einst von Hans Eichel gegründet wurde. Und weil die BaFin dem Finanzministerium unterstellt ist, attackierte insbesondere die FDP deren Chef, um auf diese Weise Finanzminister Peer Steinbrück zu treffen.
Sanio selbst ist fest davon überzeugt, dass die bisherige Arbeitsteilung zwischen BaFin und Bundesbank mit den Problemen im deutschen Bankensektor nichts zu tun hat. In the public debate about the future of supervision, but he holds back. Perhaps he also feels that the reform zeal of the government has waned considerably. There are obviously for the coalition to do more important things than to rebuild two mammoth authorities. Moreover, even union leaders now entertain doubts about the plans - and Finance Minister Wolfgang Schäuble, the issue of supervision is not necessarily reform priority.
TIME online
# Mark Schieritz
Knee Ligament Glucosamine
Umfrage: Mehrheit der Deutschen ist gegen Steuersenkungen
A new poll with a surprising conclusion: The majority of Germans reject tax cuts from 2011. Even FDP supporters are mostly against it.
The black-yellow coalition fights left - the majority of Germans, however, has a clear opinion: They are against broad tax relief as part of a comprehensive tax reform next year. How Infratest dimap on behalf of the ARD Germany, established for the trend to speak of 58 percent of respondents opposed the plans of the federal government, 38 percent in favor.
display
majority rejected this runs through all the parties. Here, the agreement among members of the FDP, who fought fiercely for a tax reform is on, with 43 percent still highest. But even in the camp of the liberals, a majority of 53 percent advocated tax cuts 2011.
For pollsters, it is remarkable that the desire for tax relief is obviously directly related to their own economic circumstances. To occur, a 49 percent majority in favor of tax breaks in households where less than 1500 € net are available. Earners, however, pay more taxes, speak out against the black and yellow tax plans. 69 percent of households with a net monthly income of at least 3000 € refuse relief.
main reason for this sentiment is, according to the researchers, the record government debt and the concern that the economic crisis in the next months could lead to further, unplanned loads. 64 percent of respondents had assumed that "the imminence of the worst of the crisis."
meet its tax dispute with the CDU and FDP in the majority of Germans to rejection. found 66 percent of the coalition parties were "divided" and "no common course" would have. In particular, Chancellor Angela Merkel (CDU) may not meet expectations so far. 82 percent believe they "must prescribe the policy direction of the federal government more clearly."
This also has implications for citizens' satisfaction with the federal government as a whole. This is compared to the previous month removed. Only 28 percent of respondents are very satisfied or satisfied with the government (minus 5 points). Less or not at all satisfied, however 67 percent (plus 7).
are in the Sunday issue no major shifts. When would elections next weekend, the Union would increase by one point to 36 percent. The FDP would come with 11 percent (minus 1) to the lowest result since the parliamentary elections of September. The SPD reaches 25 percent (plus 1). Green (12 percent) and left (10 percent) lose each one percentage point.
TIME online
# Date 08/01/2010 - 09:11 # clock source
Times Online, dpa, Reuters 
A new poll with a surprising conclusion: The majority of Germans reject tax cuts from 2011. Even FDP supporters are mostly against it.
The black-yellow coalition fights left - the majority of Germans, however, has a clear opinion: They are against broad tax relief as part of a comprehensive tax reform next year. How Infratest dimap on behalf of the ARD Germany, established for the trend to speak of 58 percent of respondents opposed the plans of the federal government, 38 percent in favor.
display
majority rejected this runs through all the parties. Here, the agreement among members of the FDP, who fought fiercely for a tax reform is on, with 43 percent still highest. But even in the camp of the liberals, a majority of 53 percent advocated tax cuts 2011.
For pollsters, it is remarkable that the desire for tax relief is obviously directly related to their own economic circumstances. To occur, a 49 percent majority in favor of tax breaks in households where less than 1500 € net are available. Earners, however, pay more taxes, speak out against the black and yellow tax plans. 69 percent of households with a net monthly income of at least 3000 € refuse relief.
main reason for this sentiment is, according to the researchers, the record government debt and the concern that the economic crisis in the next months could lead to further, unplanned loads. 64 percent of respondents had assumed that "the imminence of the worst of the crisis."
meet its tax dispute with the CDU and FDP in the majority of Germans to rejection. found 66 percent of the coalition parties were "divided" and "no common course" would have. In particular, Chancellor Angela Merkel (CDU) may not meet expectations so far. 82 percent believe they "must prescribe the policy direction of the federal government more clearly."
This also has implications for citizens' satisfaction with the federal government as a whole. This is compared to the previous month removed. Only 28 percent of respondents are very satisfied or satisfied with the government (minus 5 points). Less or not at all satisfied, however 67 percent (plus 7).
are in the Sunday issue no major shifts. When would elections next weekend, the Union would increase by one point to 36 percent. The FDP would come with 11 percent (minus 1) to the lowest result since the parliamentary elections of September. The SPD reaches 25 percent (plus 1). Green (12 percent) and left (10 percent) lose each one percentage point.
TIME online
# Date 08/01/2010 - 09:11 # clock source
Times Online, dpa, Reuters
In Your Opinion Which Is The Best Face Cream
Die Regierung ruiniert die Bundesbank
FDP leader Westerwelle want to rely on his party colleague, Carl-Ludwig Thiele to the board of the central bank, which is considered unsuitable. The central bank is running out of skilled workers.
On the eve of the traditional Twelfth Meeting of the FDP in Stuttgart leaving Homburger Secretary to the applause of the delegates a long list. Then the names of those who have become something in the new government. There were many names - and the list could soon be even longer. Carl-Ludwig Thiele, the financial expert of the Liberals should move according to the will of party chief Guido Westerwelle to the board of the Bundesbank.
for the venerable Federal Bank, the decision is a disaster. Its passage shows how to sacrifice the black-yellow coalition of Germany's international influence of partisan interests.
display
run from the end of April, the contracts of two federal bank board members Hans-Georg Fabritius and Hans-Helmut Kotz. For the post of Fabricius, which this year reached the retirement age, the federal government has the power to propose, may decide on the vacant site of the Kotz Schleswig-Holstein and Hamburg. During the coalition negotiations, is to hear Westerwelle his party colleague Thiele promised the post, which went out in filling the empty ministries. It is a high-paying job. A director at the Federal Bank deserves more as the Chancellor.
Bundesbank President Axel Weber is information on financial sources said anything but happy about the proposal. This is not surprising. Thiele is regarded as sound fiscal policy, the Bundesbank needs but experts on highly technical issues such as payments, money markets and financial market supervision with an international background. Which was not Thiele. Many decisions are now taken in international fora. Who wants to move there, send something that must be able to compete with the smart technocrat with degrees from top international universities, the U.S. or the UK. This is especially true for the key task of the central bank, the regulation of global financial markets.
It is not the first time that stand at the post award political linkages. Baden-Württemberg sent against the will of the Federal Bank recently the head of the State Chancellery, Rudolf Boemler, to the Board. Although the Berlin professionally qualified, but because of his desire to provoke as central bankers former Senator Thilo Sarrazin inappropriate to Frankfurt.
Weber urged the Chancellor so for some time to work out that play in the occupation of the Federal Bank board technical skills play a greater role - especially as the Bundesbank will also be responsible for banking supervision sein soll, die bislang in den Händen der Bafin liegt. Bislang waren die Bemühungen vergeblich. Und in der Zukunft dürfte sich daran nicht viel ändern. In Webers Umfeld sähe man es gerne, wenn für die zweite frei werdende Stelle die Amtszeit des fachlich versierten Hans-Helmut Kotz verlängert würde oder der international ebenfalls hoch angesehene Finanzstaatssekretär Jörg Asmussen nach Frankfurt geschickt würde.
Doch Asmussen ist in der SPD, und Kotz steht ihr nahe. Dass die Union über ihren Schatten springt und einen Kandidaten der Sozialdemokraten vorschlägt, gilt als unwahrscheinlich, zumal der schleswig-holsteinische Ministerpräsident Peter Harry Carstensen bei der Besetzung dem Vernehmen nach has already announced to take into account national interests. So probably comes into play Hans Reckers, which is wired well in Schleswig-Holstein. Reckers was already on the board of the Federal Reserve, but is only as fit for international offices. The hopes of the Federal Bank are therefore directed to the coming year. Since the term of office of the current Vice-President Franz-Christoph Zeitler, and it is another position to fill.
A version currently under discussion would be called to Angela Merkel's economic adviser Jens Weidmann to the board and in place of Axel Weber building, which will go to Merkel's plans for the European Central Bank, if their boss Jean-Claude Trichet to retire. Weidmann comes from the Federal Bank and is highly regarded both nationally and internationally. The catch: If Weber moves to the ECB, should the current chief economist Juergen Stark leave the office, because more than two German are in the Bank as non-communicable. Stark again, we believe in Berlin would also lay claim to the top job of the Federal Bank.
Meanwhile, the Fed go from the professionals, Weber has to take care of everything yourself - and Germany's international influence decreases. In the FDP such considerations count for little. There, one looks forward, once again to have awarded a lucrative position.
ZEIT online
# By Mark Schieritz
# Date 07/01/2010 - 18:01 clock 
FDP leader Westerwelle want to rely on his party colleague, Carl-Ludwig Thiele to the board of the central bank, which is considered unsuitable. The central bank is running out of skilled workers.
On the eve of the traditional Twelfth Meeting of the FDP in Stuttgart leaving Homburger Secretary to the applause of the delegates a long list. Then the names of those who have become something in the new government. There were many names - and the list could soon be even longer. Carl-Ludwig Thiele, the financial expert of the Liberals should move according to the will of party chief Guido Westerwelle to the board of the Bundesbank.
for the venerable Federal Bank, the decision is a disaster. Its passage shows how to sacrifice the black-yellow coalition of Germany's international influence of partisan interests.
display
run from the end of April, the contracts of two federal bank board members Hans-Georg Fabritius and Hans-Helmut Kotz. For the post of Fabricius, which this year reached the retirement age, the federal government has the power to propose, may decide on the vacant site of the Kotz Schleswig-Holstein and Hamburg. During the coalition negotiations, is to hear Westerwelle his party colleague Thiele promised the post, which went out in filling the empty ministries. It is a high-paying job. A director at the Federal Bank deserves more as the Chancellor.
Bundesbank President Axel Weber is information on financial sources said anything but happy about the proposal. This is not surprising. Thiele is regarded as sound fiscal policy, the Bundesbank needs but experts on highly technical issues such as payments, money markets and financial market supervision with an international background. Which was not Thiele. Many decisions are now taken in international fora. Who wants to move there, send something that must be able to compete with the smart technocrat with degrees from top international universities, the U.S. or the UK. This is especially true for the key task of the central bank, the regulation of global financial markets.
It is not the first time that stand at the post award political linkages. Baden-Württemberg sent against the will of the Federal Bank recently the head of the State Chancellery, Rudolf Boemler, to the Board. Although the Berlin professionally qualified, but because of his desire to provoke as central bankers former Senator Thilo Sarrazin inappropriate to Frankfurt.
Weber urged the Chancellor so for some time to work out that play in the occupation of the Federal Bank board technical skills play a greater role - especially as the Bundesbank will also be responsible for banking supervision sein soll, die bislang in den Händen der Bafin liegt. Bislang waren die Bemühungen vergeblich. Und in der Zukunft dürfte sich daran nicht viel ändern. In Webers Umfeld sähe man es gerne, wenn für die zweite frei werdende Stelle die Amtszeit des fachlich versierten Hans-Helmut Kotz verlängert würde oder der international ebenfalls hoch angesehene Finanzstaatssekretär Jörg Asmussen nach Frankfurt geschickt würde.
Doch Asmussen ist in der SPD, und Kotz steht ihr nahe. Dass die Union über ihren Schatten springt und einen Kandidaten der Sozialdemokraten vorschlägt, gilt als unwahrscheinlich, zumal der schleswig-holsteinische Ministerpräsident Peter Harry Carstensen bei der Besetzung dem Vernehmen nach has already announced to take into account national interests. So probably comes into play Hans Reckers, which is wired well in Schleswig-Holstein. Reckers was already on the board of the Federal Reserve, but is only as fit for international offices. The hopes of the Federal Bank are therefore directed to the coming year. Since the term of office of the current Vice-President Franz-Christoph Zeitler, and it is another position to fill.
A version currently under discussion would be called to Angela Merkel's economic adviser Jens Weidmann to the board and in place of Axel Weber building, which will go to Merkel's plans for the European Central Bank, if their boss Jean-Claude Trichet to retire. Weidmann comes from the Federal Bank and is highly regarded both nationally and internationally. The catch: If Weber moves to the ECB, should the current chief economist Juergen Stark leave the office, because more than two German are in the Bank as non-communicable. Stark again, we believe in Berlin would also lay claim to the top job of the Federal Bank.
Meanwhile, the Fed go from the professionals, Weber has to take care of everything yourself - and Germany's international influence decreases. In the FDP such considerations count for little. There, one looks forward, once again to have awarded a lucrative position.
ZEIT online
# By Mark Schieritz
# Date 07/01/2010 - 18:01 clock
Monday, January 4, 2010
Friendship In Bubble Letters
Richtig / Falsch Teil I - Umweltprämie
# # # Wrong:
The environmental bonus as a mere pull-forward will have no effect.
# # # Correct:
The statement that was merely a Vorziehffekt, is correct. But it was precisely a matter of stabilizing the automotive industry in the very poor in 2008/2009 and then the possible negative effect 2010/2011 in a hopefully improved economic environment to have.
It should be noted that it is the automotive industry remains a leading industry in Germany is in the employ approximately 800,000 people are.
# # # Wrong:
The environmental bonus it also has the idea of \u200b\u200ban ecological control effect given.
# # # Correct:
The introduction of environmental bonus, there has been no dedicated environmental control effect, but it was the economy and labor market factor in the center. Besides that, it indeed has a
environmental impact it has, yes, if one 10 year old cars scrapped and replaced with new ones.
# # # Wrong:
The environmental bonus is not useful.
# # # Correct: The State Environmental
premium experiences at home and abroad, top ratings in the evaluations, eg, Boston Consults.
It was already introduced in several states, not least of President Obama. 
# # # Wrong:
The environmental bonus as a mere pull-forward will have no effect.
# # # Correct:
The statement that was merely a Vorziehffekt, is correct. But it was precisely a matter of stabilizing the automotive industry in the very poor in 2008/2009 and then the possible negative effect 2010/2011 in a hopefully improved economic environment to have.
It should be noted that it is the automotive industry remains a leading industry in Germany is in the employ approximately 800,000 people are.
# # # Wrong:
The environmental bonus it also has the idea of \u200b\u200ban ecological control effect given.
# # # Correct:
The introduction of environmental bonus, there has been no dedicated environmental control effect, but it was the economy and labor market factor in the center. Besides that, it indeed has a
environmental impact it has, yes, if one 10 year old cars scrapped and replaced with new ones.
# # # Wrong:
The environmental bonus is not useful.
# # # Correct: The State Environmental
premium experiences at home and abroad, top ratings in the evaluations, eg, Boston Consults.
It was already introduced in several states, not least of President Obama.
Saturday, January 2, 2010
Why Is My Cervix Staying High After Ovulation
Themenschwerpunkt Finanzmarktkrise
On the side of the Austrian Ministry of Finance
focus on "financial crisis" 
On the side of the Austrian Ministry of Finance
focus on "financial crisis"
West Corner Feng Shui
Haushaltsdefizit des Bundes: Steuern senken, aber wie?
The coalition has to save ten billion from 2011 € per year - and still wants to cut taxes. Can it work without tax increase?
It would not be surprising if the Federal Government against the disastrous financial situation and the need to cut from 2011 annual double-digit billions, to the large screws would turn. This includes front office of the contributions to unemployment insurance and subsidies for health insurance. In these areas can be saved generating large amounts. However, at the expense of millions of contributors.
display
Why would an increase in social security necessary?
The grand coalition had reduced the rate of contribution to unemployment insurance since 2006 in steps of 6.5 to 2.8 percentage points. As the financial crisis and the resulting increase in unemployment, however, the reserves of the Federal Employment Agency (BA) used up in the current year up to small remnants. Therefore, deliberate Union und FDP schon während der Koalitionsverhandlungen, den Beitragssatz mittelfristig auf 4,5 Prozent anzuheben, um milliardenschwere Bundeszuschüsse an die BA zu vermeiden.
Der allgemeine Beitragssatz für die Krankenversicherung wurde im Juli 2009, ebenfalls von der großen Koalition, auf 14,9 Prozent gesenkt. Entsprechend erhöhte sich der Bundeszuschuss an den Gesundheitsfonds. Die gesetzliche Krankenversicherung erhält 2010 fast 16 Milliarden Euro aus dem Bundeshaushalt. Schwarz-Gelb erwägt nun offenbar eine Deckelung dieser Zuschüsse aus dem Steuertopf. Das könnte im Ergebnis zu höheren Beitragssätzen führen und die geplante Reform der Krankenversicherung vielleicht sogar verhindern, denn sie ließe not be achieved without additional federal subsidies.
In the statutory scheme for the time being threatened no trouble. Given the tight budgets in the coming years, the promised contribution reduction from 2012 but is likely to disappear in the realm of beautiful dreams.
burdened What is the federal budget?
The slump in economic growth (2009: minus five percent) and the slow recovery of the economy (2010: plus a maximum of two percent) federal, state and local authorities have fallen into a severe debt crisis.
According to the November tax estimate, the Federation will be recorded in the next budget year, only 213.8 billion euros in taxes. Or 10.3 Billion euros less than in 2009 and 25.4 billion euros less than in 2008. After the financial planning, tax revenues will be 2013 at the earliest to reach the same level as before the economic downturn. The federal spending to grow next year still up 7.3 percent and the deficit rose to a record high of 85.5 billion euros. That is, 26 percent of federal spending in 2010 will be financed through loans. 2008, this debt financing rate was four percent. The new debt will be offset by other tax cuts and financing the stimulus I and II and the Growth Acceleration Act. The total debt is increasing in Germany in 2010 to nearly € 1.9 trillion. They are 78 percent of gross domestic product (BIP).
Wie können da Steuern gesenkt werden?
Das ist keine Frage der finanzpolitischen Ratio, sondern des politischen Willens. Die FDP drängt auf eine weitere Steuerentlastung zugunsten kleiner und mittlerer Einkommen ab 2011. Die Oppositionsparteien SPD, Grüne und Linke, aber auch Wirtschaftswissenschaftler und Banken warnen dringend vor weiteren Steuergeschenken. Auch die Länder sorgen sich um ihre finanzielle Basis und fordern einen höheren Anteil am bundesweiten Umsatzsteueraufkommen.
Gibt es weitere Sparüberlegungen?
Bundesfinanzminister Wolfgang Schäuble (CDU) hat ab 2011 einen strikten Sparkurs angekündigt. Die Ausgaben des Bundes sollen dann jährlich um a drop to two percent. Concrete proposals will Schäuble present but probably only after the state election in North Rhine-Westphalia in May 2010. In coalition parties will discuss the nationwide reduction of public subsidies and services, including social spending. An increase in VAT exclude the CDU and FDP been categorically. Clemens Fuest, Chairman of the Scientific Advisory Council of the Federal Ministry of Finance, believes the value-added tax increase but a last resort, when the federal budget not with ordinary savings programs can be rehabilitated.
What has the debt brake with all this?
The federal government is under pressure. You can not choose it, whether and how much they will save. From 2011, issues identified in the Basic Law Debt Brake: 2016 will be holding the annual structural deficit to 0.35 percent of gross domestic product. Countries should take no more credits from 2020, apart from emergencies. Federal and state governments are still arguing, as will the structural debt (as opposed to the cyclical debt) is calculated, but to-date, the net borrowing by the federal annually from 2011 to decline by ten billion euros. Otherwise, the budget is unconstitutional. Also, Europe is the German government on its feet. By 2009, the Maastricht criteria (borrowing a maximum of three percent of GDP) are exceeded. An excessive deficit procedure was initiated in Brussels.
TIME online
# By Ulrich Zawatka-Gerlach
# Date 23/12/2009 - 09:45 clock 
The coalition has to save ten billion from 2011 € per year - and still wants to cut taxes. Can it work without tax increase?
It would not be surprising if the Federal Government against the disastrous financial situation and the need to cut from 2011 annual double-digit billions, to the large screws would turn. This includes front office of the contributions to unemployment insurance and subsidies for health insurance. In these areas can be saved generating large amounts. However, at the expense of millions of contributors.
display
Why would an increase in social security necessary?
The grand coalition had reduced the rate of contribution to unemployment insurance since 2006 in steps of 6.5 to 2.8 percentage points. As the financial crisis and the resulting increase in unemployment, however, the reserves of the Federal Employment Agency (BA) used up in the current year up to small remnants. Therefore, deliberate Union und FDP schon während der Koalitionsverhandlungen, den Beitragssatz mittelfristig auf 4,5 Prozent anzuheben, um milliardenschwere Bundeszuschüsse an die BA zu vermeiden.
Der allgemeine Beitragssatz für die Krankenversicherung wurde im Juli 2009, ebenfalls von der großen Koalition, auf 14,9 Prozent gesenkt. Entsprechend erhöhte sich der Bundeszuschuss an den Gesundheitsfonds. Die gesetzliche Krankenversicherung erhält 2010 fast 16 Milliarden Euro aus dem Bundeshaushalt. Schwarz-Gelb erwägt nun offenbar eine Deckelung dieser Zuschüsse aus dem Steuertopf. Das könnte im Ergebnis zu höheren Beitragssätzen führen und die geplante Reform der Krankenversicherung vielleicht sogar verhindern, denn sie ließe not be achieved without additional federal subsidies.
In the statutory scheme for the time being threatened no trouble. Given the tight budgets in the coming years, the promised contribution reduction from 2012 but is likely to disappear in the realm of beautiful dreams.
burdened What is the federal budget?
The slump in economic growth (2009: minus five percent) and the slow recovery of the economy (2010: plus a maximum of two percent) federal, state and local authorities have fallen into a severe debt crisis.
According to the November tax estimate, the Federation will be recorded in the next budget year, only 213.8 billion euros in taxes. Or 10.3 Billion euros less than in 2009 and 25.4 billion euros less than in 2008. After the financial planning, tax revenues will be 2013 at the earliest to reach the same level as before the economic downturn. The federal spending to grow next year still up 7.3 percent and the deficit rose to a record high of 85.5 billion euros. That is, 26 percent of federal spending in 2010 will be financed through loans. 2008, this debt financing rate was four percent. The new debt will be offset by other tax cuts and financing the stimulus I and II and the Growth Acceleration Act. The total debt is increasing in Germany in 2010 to nearly € 1.9 trillion. They are 78 percent of gross domestic product (BIP).
Wie können da Steuern gesenkt werden?
Das ist keine Frage der finanzpolitischen Ratio, sondern des politischen Willens. Die FDP drängt auf eine weitere Steuerentlastung zugunsten kleiner und mittlerer Einkommen ab 2011. Die Oppositionsparteien SPD, Grüne und Linke, aber auch Wirtschaftswissenschaftler und Banken warnen dringend vor weiteren Steuergeschenken. Auch die Länder sorgen sich um ihre finanzielle Basis und fordern einen höheren Anteil am bundesweiten Umsatzsteueraufkommen.
Gibt es weitere Sparüberlegungen?
Bundesfinanzminister Wolfgang Schäuble (CDU) hat ab 2011 einen strikten Sparkurs angekündigt. Die Ausgaben des Bundes sollen dann jährlich um a drop to two percent. Concrete proposals will Schäuble present but probably only after the state election in North Rhine-Westphalia in May 2010. In coalition parties will discuss the nationwide reduction of public subsidies and services, including social spending. An increase in VAT exclude the CDU and FDP been categorically. Clemens Fuest, Chairman of the Scientific Advisory Council of the Federal Ministry of Finance, believes the value-added tax increase but a last resort, when the federal budget not with ordinary savings programs can be rehabilitated.
What has the debt brake with all this?
The federal government is under pressure. You can not choose it, whether and how much they will save. From 2011, issues identified in the Basic Law Debt Brake: 2016 will be holding the annual structural deficit to 0.35 percent of gross domestic product. Countries should take no more credits from 2020, apart from emergencies. Federal and state governments are still arguing, as will the structural debt (as opposed to the cyclical debt) is calculated, but to-date, the net borrowing by the federal annually from 2011 to decline by ten billion euros. Otherwise, the budget is unconstitutional. Also, Europe is the German government on its feet. By 2009, the Maastricht criteria (borrowing a maximum of three percent of GDP) are exceeded. An excessive deficit procedure was initiated in Brussels.
TIME online
# By Ulrich Zawatka-Gerlach
# Date 23/12/2009 - 09:45 clock
Can I Reverse Peridontitis
Sinnlose Schulden: Schwarz-Gelb verschenkt Geld – und schwächt ohne Not den Staat.
These two words to say almost anything. »Black and yellow," Union leaders call themselves their own government coalition, although it was a battle cry of the left long. They do not say "Christian-liberal. And certainly not, "" conservative. This latter event would be too presumptuous. Because managing a budget, this government throws just about everything on board, what was once considered conservative - in the best sense, as preserving - was.
to a conservative financial policy würde es gehören, künftige Generationen nicht mit den Schulden der Vergangenheit zu belasten. Frisches Geld würde gezielt in den Ausbau der Infrastruktur investiert, um die Produktivität der Volkswirtschaft zu erhöhen. Der Staat würde finanziell gestärkt statt durch Steuersenkungen geschwächt, weil dieser Staat für kommende Unsicherheiten gerüstet sein muss. Schwarz-Gelb jedoch spielt lieber va banque .
Wohlgemerkt: Es geht nicht darum, mitten in einer schweren Wirtschaftskrise um jeden Preis zu sparen. Natürlich muss ein Finanzminister höhere Schulden eingehen, wenn die Steuereinnahmen wegbrechen und die Ausgaben für Arbeitslose steigen. Die Regierung aber setzt noch eins drauf, gibt Geld "For heirs and hoteliers and calls the" growth acceleration law. And it promises tax cuts for 2011, although the tax burden in this country still is the slightest problem. Of all risk, a conservative-led coalition to destroy the public financial resources sustainably.
was for decades, the fiscal model of the Union characterized by a triad: the debt of today are tomorrow's taxes, because citizens know that they go shopping for debt-financed tax gifts, but rather put the money back, at the end is the state with higher debts. Now is not this triad. Now called CDU politicians such as Finance Minister Wolfgang Schäuble and Lower Saxony Premier Christian Wulff to the story. In no case should the government repeat the mistakes of the thirties and by tightening too much, the savings crisis. Apart from the fact that the Conservatives to argue exactly as Oskar Lafontaine is doing this for years: Senseless does not justify the tax cuts.
fact, the government makes doubly vulnerable. Either match the old beliefs and the citizens are rationally advance that debt-financed tax cuts only lead to higher taxes, why should they then go and buy more irrational act? Or the beliefs are no longer correct: How is the government then react in the next crisis? One more thing on it Saddle? How can a sound fiscal policy in these uncertain times, look at all? It has black and yellow no answer. And remain helpless citizens. The consumer climate at any rate has fallen with the growth acceleration law.
TIME online
# # Date By Marc Brost
17/12/2009 - 13:50 clock 
These two words to say almost anything. »Black and yellow," Union leaders call themselves their own government coalition, although it was a battle cry of the left long. They do not say "Christian-liberal. And certainly not, "" conservative. This latter event would be too presumptuous. Because managing a budget, this government throws just about everything on board, what was once considered conservative - in the best sense, as preserving - was.
to a conservative financial policy würde es gehören, künftige Generationen nicht mit den Schulden der Vergangenheit zu belasten. Frisches Geld würde gezielt in den Ausbau der Infrastruktur investiert, um die Produktivität der Volkswirtschaft zu erhöhen. Der Staat würde finanziell gestärkt statt durch Steuersenkungen geschwächt, weil dieser Staat für kommende Unsicherheiten gerüstet sein muss. Schwarz-Gelb jedoch spielt lieber va banque .
Wohlgemerkt: Es geht nicht darum, mitten in einer schweren Wirtschaftskrise um jeden Preis zu sparen. Natürlich muss ein Finanzminister höhere Schulden eingehen, wenn die Steuereinnahmen wegbrechen und die Ausgaben für Arbeitslose steigen. Die Regierung aber setzt noch eins drauf, gibt Geld "For heirs and hoteliers and calls the" growth acceleration law. And it promises tax cuts for 2011, although the tax burden in this country still is the slightest problem. Of all risk, a conservative-led coalition to destroy the public financial resources sustainably.
was for decades, the fiscal model of the Union characterized by a triad: the debt of today are tomorrow's taxes, because citizens know that they go shopping for debt-financed tax gifts, but rather put the money back, at the end is the state with higher debts. Now is not this triad. Now called CDU politicians such as Finance Minister Wolfgang Schäuble and Lower Saxony Premier Christian Wulff to the story. In no case should the government repeat the mistakes of the thirties and by tightening too much, the savings crisis. Apart from the fact that the Conservatives to argue exactly as Oskar Lafontaine is doing this for years: Senseless does not justify the tax cuts.
fact, the government makes doubly vulnerable. Either match the old beliefs and the citizens are rationally advance that debt-financed tax cuts only lead to higher taxes, why should they then go and buy more irrational act? Or the beliefs are no longer correct: How is the government then react in the next crisis? One more thing on it Saddle? How can a sound fiscal policy in these uncertain times, look at all? It has black and yellow no answer. And remain helpless citizens. The consumer climate at any rate has fallen with the growth acceleration law.
TIME online
# # Date By Marc Brost
17/12/2009 - 13:50 clock
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)